We study the methodological problems of self-psychology in the context of developing a paradigm of humanitarian and non-classical type of rationality. Historical background of psychology in the context of the system is not so much a restoration of a static system of goals and values of paradigmatic categories as much as the experience of deconstruction, a specific algorithm for a holistic vision of psychological knowledge to the identification of implicit value-semantic dimensions of human cognition. Methodological shift from onedimensional, monosystematic theories to systematically deterministic conception of he human is an ontological appeal to the multidimensionality of his/her spiritual sphere, its values and meaning. Historical and systematic approach developed by V. Klochko, continues the tradition of historical-categorical, historical and evolutionary approaches, but differs from the traditional cumulative-line view of history focusing on the specifics of the changes of subject representations of the mental, and structuring in favour of the differential characteristic and historicity of the procedural one. Trans-spective analysis actualising the present in the past, reveals the inner tendencies of psychology, identifies the meaning of its substantive transformation. If the traditions of classical epistemological indeterminacy of the potential and actual uncertainty in the object of psychology considered it scientifically false, within the historical and systematic approach the subject of psychology is a methodological invariant of its scientific development. Its uncertainty is a prerequisite for systemic complications and psychological self-knowledge, systemic manifestation of historical levels of particular psychological knowledge of the human. Through the concept of chronotope and the attractor state trans-spective vision of modern psychology is justified. Thus, the historical and systematic approach can serve as a means of methodological analysis of the scientific establishment of psychology that reveals: 1) systematic relations between the theories of various degrees of generality in their relation to empirical knowledge 2) interdisciplinary interaction (multidisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity) based on the methodology of the network that can detect the trend of its scientific establishment 3) values and meanings of the researcher, which are a part of ones personal knowledge (M. Polanyi) 4) оntological, anthropological (metaphysical) foundation methodological shift. (And, after U. Maturana and F. Varela, metasystem professional thinking of a psychologist can be viewed in the context of the history of structural linking of the basic concepts of psychological schools and theories) 5) transformation of the subject are systemically caused not so much by a change of epistemological justification of paradigmatic samples, but by the historical and cultural context of the being of the thinking (M. Mamardashvili).

Исследуются методологические проблемы самоорганизации психологии в контексте становления гуманитарной парадигмы и неклассического типа рациональности. Показано, что история психологического познания есть не столько восстановление статической системы целей и парадигмальных значений категорий, сколько опыт деконструкции, специфический алгоритм его целостного видения с выявлением имплицитных ценностно-смысловых измерений постижения человека. Через понятия хронотопа и аттрактора обосновано трансспективное видение состояния современной психологии.