
В настоящей статье рецензируется изданный в 2014 году группой известных ученых-юристов Комментарий к Конституции Российской Федерации, отмечаются его положительные качества и указываются отдельные погрешности.
In this article the author analyzes the Commentarium to the Russian Constitution, writed by famous russian doctors of law. The author noticed the positive achiwements and some noncorrections in this book.
КОНСТИТУЦИЯ РОССИЙСКОЙ ФЕДЕРАЦИИ,CONSTITUTION OF RUSSIAN FEDERATION,КОММЕНТАРИИ К СТАТЬЯМ КОНСТИТУЦИИ РОССИИ,COMMENTS TO CONSTITUTIONAL ARTICLES,КОНСТИТУЦИОННО-ПРАВОВЫЕ ИНСТИТУТЫ И НОРМЫ,CONSTITUTIONAL LEGISLATION,КОНСТИТУЦИОННОЕ ЗАКОНОДАТЕЛЬСТВО
КОНСТИТУЦИЯ РОССИЙСКОЙ ФЕДЕРАЦИИ,CONSTITUTION OF RUSSIAN FEDERATION,КОММЕНТАРИИ К СТАТЬЯМ КОНСТИТУЦИИ РОССИИ,COMMENTS TO CONSTITUTIONAL ARTICLES,КОНСТИТУЦИОННО-ПРАВОВЫЕ ИНСТИТУТЫ И НОРМЫ,CONSTITUTIONAL LEGISLATION,КОНСТИТУЦИОННОЕ ЗАКОНОДАТЕЛЬСТВО
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
