
This article discusses evidentiary presumptions in their theoretical aspects. Opposing views on the presumption of the Soviet-period and contemporary scholars are considered. Special attention is focused on procedural legal presumptions, in particular, on the structure of presumption as a norm, on the mechanism of action of presumptions in the allocation of responsibilities for proving, etc.
Обсуждаются доказательственные презумпции в их теоретическом аспекте. Рассмотрены противоположные взгляды на презумпцию процессуалистов советского периода и современных ученых. Особое внимание сосредоточено на процессуально-правовых презумпциях, в частности, на структуре нормы презумпции, механизме действия презумпций при распределении обязанностей по доказыванию и пр.
ДОКАЗАТЕЛЬСТВЕННАЯ ПРЕЗУМПЦИЯ, СТРУКТУРА НОРМЫ ПРЕЗУМПЦИИ, ОПРОВЕРЖИМОСТЬ ПРЕЗУМПЦИИ, РАСПРЕДЕЛЕНИЕ ОБЯЗАННОСТЕЙ ПО ДОКАЗЫВАНИЮ
ДОКАЗАТЕЛЬСТВЕННАЯ ПРЕЗУМПЦИЯ, СТРУКТУРА НОРМЫ ПРЕЗУМПЦИИ, ОПРОВЕРЖИМОСТЬ ПРЕЗУМПЦИИ, РАСПРЕДЕЛЕНИЕ ОБЯЗАННОСТЕЙ ПО ДОКАЗЫВАНИЮ
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
