Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Kazanskij Medicinski...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Применение гастроэнтерологического опросника GSRS в ранней диагностике синдрома хронической абдоминальной ишемии

Применение гастроэнтерологического опросника GSRS в ранней диагностике синдрома хронической абдоминальной ишемии

Abstract

Цель. Оценить эффективность гастроэнтерологического опросника GSRS (от англ. Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale — шкала оценки желудочно-кишечных симптомов) в качестве амбулаторного скринингового теста в ранней диагностике синдрома хронической абдоминальной ишемии. Методы. Оценку выраженности гастроэнтерологических симптомов проводили с применением опросника качества жизни GSRS у 110 больных с хроническим абдоминальным болевым синдромом. При ультразвуковой допплерографии у 39 (35,5%) больных нарушений кровотока по непарным висцеральным ветвям брюшного отдела аорты не было выявлено (первая группа). Ко второй группе отнесён 71 (64,5%) пациент с нарушениями кровотока в непарных висцеральных ветвях брюшной части аорты (уплотнение и кальциноз стенок сосудов, экстраи интравазальные стенозы сосудов до 40-70% с локальной и региональной значимостью изменений кровотока, а также изменением характера кровотока после функциональной нагрузки). Результаты. Различия частоты и выраженности болевого, рефлюксного и диарейного синдромов в исследованных группах не имели статистической значимости. Диспептический синдром отмечен у 29 (74,4%) пациентов первой группы и 71 (100%) больного второй группы, средний балл по данному синдрому в опроснике GSRS составил в первой группе 3,67±0,51, а во второй — 5,07±0,32. Констипационный синдром был отмечен у 16 (41%) пациентов первой группы и 54 (76,1%) больных второй группы при среднем балле 1,33±0,31 в первой группе и 3,04±0,32 во второй. Средний итоговый балл опроса был значимо выше в группе больных с синдромом хронической абдоминальной ишемии — 13,51±0,84, против 9,94±1,13 у пациентов без ультразвуковых признаков нарушений висцерального кровотока. Вывод. Использование гастроэнтерологического опросника качества жизни GSRS позволяет выявлять синдромы, характерные для хронической абдоминальной ишемии.

Aim. To assess the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) questionnaire as an ambulatory screening test for early diagnosis of abdominal angina. Methods. An assessment of abdominal symptoms severity and quality of life was performed using the GSRS questionnaire in 110 patients with abdominal angina. No sings of abdominal angina and no vascular abnormalities were found at Doppler sonography in 39 (35.5%) of patients (main group). In 71 (64.5%) patients distributed to the second group signs of insufficient blood flow (including vascular wall calcification and thickening, medium and small arteries compression and narrowing up to 40-70%, and inadequate blood flow after exercise. Results. There were no statistically significant differences found in prevalence of abdominal pain, reflux and diarrhea between two groups. Dyspepsia was noted in 29 (74.4%) patients of first group and in 71 (100%) patients of the second group. Average GSRS scores were 3.67±0.51 and 5.07±0.32 accordingly in those patients. Constipation was present in 16 (41%) patients of first group and in 54 (76.1%) patients of the second group, with the GSRS score 1.33±0.31 and 3.04±0.32 accordingly in those patients. Average total GSRS score was significantly higher in patients with abdominal angina — 13.51±0.84 points versus 9.94±1.13 in patients without signs of abdominal angina on Doppler sonography. Conclusion. The use of GSRS questionnaire allows to detect syndromes characteristic for abdominal angina.

Keywords

АТЕРОСКЛЕРОЗ, ОРГАНЫ ПИЩЕВАРЕНИЯ, ХРОНИЧЕСКАЯ АБДОМИНАЛЬНАЯ ИШЕМИЯ

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
gold