
The article is devoted to comparison of polysemy, derivation and phrase-creation in order to determine their general properties. These three ways of nominations are investigated as components of a whole as vectors of realization of a lexemes creative potential. In the article the factors infl uencing evolu-tion of polysemy, derivation and phrase-creation, these processes with their spe-cifi c features, the nominees formed at their participation, system groups of these nominees are considered.
Статья посвящена сопоставлению полисемии, словообразования и фразеообразования с целью выявления их общих свойств. Три данных способа номинации исследованы как составные части единого целого как векторы реализации креативного потенциала лексемы. В статье рассмотрены факторы, влияющие на развитие полисемии, словообразования и фразеообразования; сами указанные процессы с их специфическими особенностями; образованные при их участии номинанты; системные группировки этих номинантов.
ЛЕКСИЧЕСКАЯ ЕДИНИЦА, КРЕАТИВНЫЙ ПОТЕНЦИАЛ, ПОЛИСЕМИЯ, СЛОВООБРАЗОВАНИЕ, ФРАЗЕООБРАЗОВАНИЕ
ЛЕКСИЧЕСКАЯ ЕДИНИЦА, КРЕАТИВНЫЙ ПОТЕНЦИАЛ, ПОЛИСЕМИЯ, СЛОВООБРАЗОВАНИЕ, ФРАЗЕООБРАЗОВАНИЕ
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
