Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Вестник Волгоградско...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Деконструкция дискурсивной технологии власти

Деконструкция дискурсивной технологии власти

Abstract

The article considers a vital issue of struggling for human consciousness via language being a tool, subject, and result of power implementation mechanisms. Different discourse technologies, revealed by Russian and foreign linguists, are characterized. The author introduces and gives proof to a phenomenon ‘discourse technology of power’. Discourse structures of smart, soft and hard powers, which are the base of discourse technology of power, are described. Examples of such technologies from mass media texts, constructed with the help of lingua-cognitive mechanisms of spindoctoring, focusing, defocusing etc., are given. They allow to manipulate the content, misinterpret, distort or hide it, replacing concepts. It is proved that any semantic variation contributes to a change in evaluation and emotions, “imposes” a certain attitude to the situation, shifts the focus of modalities in perception. With the help of critical discourse analysis methods, specially designed technological discourse of power, domination and control are identified and deconstructed as the dominative means of a mass consciousness control. An important practical task facing modern linguistics is framed. It is to uncover the mechanisms of discourse manipulative technologies and share them with a concerned addressee to resist the attraction of manipulative content generated by professionals and do not fall under its influence.

В статье рассматриваются проблемы языка как орудия, объекта и результата действия механизмов власти и проблема борьбы за сознание человека. Охарактеризованы выявленные в отечественной и зарубежной науке разнообразные дискурсивные технологии и обосновано вводимое автором понятие дискурсивной технологии власти. Описаны дискурсивные структуры умной, мягкой и жесткой силы, посредством которых дискурсивная технология власти реализуется. В качестве иллюстрации приводятся примеры из текстов СМИ, сконструированные с применением лингвокогнитивных механизмов спин-докторинга, фокусирования, дефокусирования и др., позволяющие манипулировать смыслом, искажать или скрывать его, подменяя понятия. Показано, что семантическое варьирование способствует изменению оценки и эмоций, «навязывает» определенное отношение к ситуации, смещает фокус модальности восприятия. На основе методологии критического дискурс-анализа деконструирован специально созданный технологичный дискурс власти, который позволяет доминировать над массовым сознанием и управлять им. Сформулирована важная практическая задача, стоящая перед современной лингвистикой, раскрыть механизмы манипулятивных дискурсивных технологий и ознакомить с ними заинтересованного адресата с целью противодействовать манипулятивному притяжению информационного содержания, сформированного профессионалами, и не подпадать под его влияние.

Keywords

ДИСКУРСИВНАЯ ТЕХНОЛОГИЯ,ВЛАСТЬ ДИСКУРСА,СИЛА ДИСКУРСА,ЛИНГВОКОГНИТИВНЫЙ МЕХАНИЗМ,МАНИПУЛЯЦИЯ,ДЕКОНСТРУКЦИЯ,DISCOURSE TECHNOLOGY,DISCOURSE POWER,POWER OF DISCOURSE,LINGUA-COGNITIVE MECHANISM,MANIPULATION,DECONSTRUCTION

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
gold