
The article is devoted to the actual problem connected with the collecting evidences, situated abroad. In 2001 the Russian Federation adopted the principal international treaty which regulates this matter: to the Hague Convention of 1970 on the Taking of Evidence Abroad in Civil or Commercial Matters. The author of the article analyzes the main problems of the Hague Convention of 1970, as well as the reasons it is not applied by Russian judicial organs. The author suggests several solutions, including appointment of the central authority as envisaged by the Hague Convention of 1970 and determination of a status of official non-published international treaties. Apart from this the author analyzes the institute of pre-trial discovery in comparison with Russian Federation and Anglo-Saxon law countries, where this institute originates from.
ГААГСКАЯ КОНВЕНЦИЯ 1970 Г.,ПОЛУЧЕНИЕ ДОКАЗАТЕЛЬСТВ ЗА ГРАНИЦЕЙ,МЕЖДУНАРОДНЫЙ ГРАЖДАНСКИЙ ПРОЦЕСС,ДОСУДЕБНОЕ РАСКРЫТИЕ ДОКАЗАТЕЛЬСТВ,ДОКАЗАТЕЛЬСТВА
ГААГСКАЯ КОНВЕНЦИЯ 1970 Г.,ПОЛУЧЕНИЕ ДОКАЗАТЕЛЬСТВ ЗА ГРАНИЦЕЙ,МЕЖДУНАРОДНЫЙ ГРАЖДАНСКИЙ ПРОЦЕСС,ДОСУДЕБНОЕ РАСКРЫТИЕ ДОКАЗАТЕЛЬСТВ,ДОКАЗАТЕЛЬСТВА
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
