
The thesis deals with the fundamental philosophical question: "What is evil?" It is devided into three main chapters. In the first one I try to verify and define the term "evil". Then I examine two selected concepts dualism and privation theory in the second chapter. While the dualististic theory (which says there are two equal forces) seems to be inconsistent, the privation theory can in some way provide the explanation (or at least partial explanation) of the phenomenon of evil. With these consderations we can approach to the third part where "the argument of evil" (which is usually used as evidence against the exstence of God) is concerned and then questioned.
dualism; privační teorie; metaphysical evil; morální zlo; Augustine; Augustin; privation; argument ze zla; zlo; moral evil; evil; metafyzické zlo; argument from evil; teodicea; theodicea; dualismus; privace; privation theory
dualism; privační teorie; metaphysical evil; morální zlo; Augustine; Augustin; privation; argument ze zla; zlo; moral evil; evil; metafyzické zlo; argument from evil; teodicea; theodicea; dualismus; privace; privation theory
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
