
?? ?????????????????? ???????????? ???????????????????? ???????????????????? ?????????????????? ?????????????????????????? ???????????????????? ???????????? ?????????????????????? ?????????????????? ???????????????? ???? ???????? ???? ???????????????????????????? ??????????-??????????????. ???????????? ???????? ?? ?????????? ?????????? ?????????????????? ???????????? ?????? ?????????? ??????????????. ???? ?????? ???????????????????????????? ?????? Chaetina R o n d a n i, ?????????????????? ???? ?????????? ????????????, ???? ?????? ?????? ???? ?????? ???????????? ?????? ?????????? ????????. ???????????????????????? ?????????????? ?????????? ?????????????? ?? ?????????????????? ?? (???????????? ????????????) Ziminia M e s n i l ??? ?????????????????????????????? ????????, ???????????????????? ???? ???????????????????? ???? ???????????????????????? ?? ???????????? (Mesnil, 1963), ?? Amphicestotiia dispar V i l l ?? n ?? u v ??, ???????????????????? ?????????? ?? ?????????????? ???????? ?? ???????????????? ????????????. ???????? ?????? ?? ?????? ???????? ?????????? ???????? ?????????????? ??. ??. ?????????????????????? ?????? ?????????? ?????? ??????????, ???? ???? ??????????????. ???? ???????????????? ?????????????????? ????????. ???????? ???????? ?????????? ???????????????? ?? ?????????????????? ?????????????????? ???????????????? ???? ???????? (????????). ?????????? ?????????????? ???????????????????? ?????????????????????? ?????????????????? ???????????????? ???? ???????? ???? ???????????????????????????? ?????????????????????? ???????????? ?? ????????????????????.
4 genera (Chaetina R ?? n d a n i, Ziminia Mesni l and others) and 6 species of Tachinidae new for the Caucasian fauna are recorded. The description of the new species of the genus Exorista Meige n ??? E. belanovskii V. Richter. sp. n. compared with E. sorbillans Wiedeman n is given. A new genus and species Naira nata V. Richter , g e n et sp. n. belonging to the subfamily Macquartiinae (sensu van Emden, 1954) is described. The genus Naira V. Richter , gen. n. is distinguished by the following characters: frons broad; proclinate orbital bristles are present in both sexes; I praevertical brislle; occiput with numerous black setulae behind the occipital row face not concave, with broad facialia; third antennal segment 1.8 times as long as second; eyes bare; prosternum bare; barett heary; scutellum with crossed strong apical bristles almost as long as subapicals, claws of the fore-tarsae are shorter than their last segment; win g with open first posterior cell; abdomen broad; dorsal excavation of the second tergile is not quite reaching his hind margin.
?????????????? ????????????
?????????????? ????????????
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
