
Biological processes such as DNA replication, RNA transcription, and protein translation operate with remarkable speed and accuracy in selecting the right substrate from pools of chemically identical molecules. This result is obtained by non-equilibrium reactions that dissipate chemical energy. It is widely recognized that there must be a trade-off between speed, error, and dissipation characterizing these systems. In this paper, we quantify this trade-off using tools from mathematical optimization theory. We characterize the Pareto optimal front for a generalized version of Hopfield's kinetic proofreading model, which is a paradigmatic example of biological error correction. We find that models with more proofreading steps are characterized by better trade-offs. Furthermore, we numerically study scaling relations between speed, accuracy, and dissipation on the Pareto front.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
