
doi: 10.14763/2025.3.2019
handle: 10419/324162
The recent amendment to the European eIDAS Regulation has established the European Digital Identity Framework, which introduces electronic attestations of attributes. Technically, these attestations involve auxiliary information to ensure their verifiability, leading to the generation, processing, and storage of more than just personal data. In particular, this auxiliary information contains globally unique information that can be misused as personal identifiers and poses risks to the privacy of individuals engaging in transactions using a European Digital Identity Wallet. As such, they create tension with the principle of data minimisation under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). On the positive side, privacy-enhancing technologies, especially zero-knowledge proofs (ZKPs), are rapidly advancing and capable of addressing this tension. In this paper, we analyse the impact of the availability of these techniques on legal compatibility in the European electronic identification context and explore the tension field between the technical requirements of the digital identity wallet and the GDPR’s data minimisation principle. We illustrate this dynamic through the specific examples of cryptographic data processed to ensure the authenticity and integrity of attributes' electronic attestations and shed light on how ZKPs can support legal compliance. This paper contributes to the privacy-oriented electronic identity management literature by providing policy and technical recommendations for achieving data minimisation compliance. We emphasise the necessity for regulatory bodies to enforce the use of advanced solutions like ZKPs to achieve unlinkability and unobservability. Accelerating the standardisation of these technologies is crucial for safeguarding user privacy and achieving seamless regulatory compliance in digital identity systems.
info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/340, info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/000, Information theory, Internet Policy, Zeroknowledge proofs, info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/380, ddc:300, Social Sciences, Commerce, communications & transportation, Electronic attestation, Electronic identification, Computer science, knowledge & systems, eIDAS, Q300-390, GDPR, Q350-390, info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/300, Zero-knowledge proofs, Cybernetics
info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/340, info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/000, Information theory, Internet Policy, Zeroknowledge proofs, info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/380, ddc:300, Social Sciences, Commerce, communications & transportation, Electronic attestation, Electronic identification, Computer science, knowledge & systems, eIDAS, Q300-390, GDPR, Q350-390, info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/300, Zero-knowledge proofs, Cybernetics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
