
The article draws attention to the fact that, in accordance with the peculiarity of proving the guilt of the accused in the criminal process, it is not possible to build a united system of interbranch prejudice in the judicial system. In the conclusion, the author notices that applying of undoubted prejudice does not provide for progressing of the criminal court procedure and makes difficulties in applying the procedural law.
В статье анализируются позиции высших судов относительно применения межотраслевой преюдиции в рамках арбитражного процесса. Применение указанных позиций, по мнению автора, представляется допустимым и в рамках уголовного процесса, в силу установления принципа межотраслевой преюдиции во всех областях российского процессуального права.
procedural law, judicial system, уголовный процесс, межотраслевая преюдиция, преюдиция, undoubted, доказывание, гражданский процесс, prejudice, Interbranch
procedural law, judicial system, уголовный процесс, межотраслевая преюдиция, преюдиция, undoubted, доказывание, гражданский процесс, prejudice, Interbranch
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
