Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Понятие «сверхъестественное» и различие научного и религиозного образов мышления

Authors: Popov, Petr L.;

Понятие «сверхъестественное» и различие научного и религиозного образов мышления

Abstract

Confidence in the existence of supernatural forces and their impact onto human being is the essence of the religious mentality. This article considers the concept content of supernatural realities (forces, worlds, capacities). The difference between science and religion is associated with the requirement for the possibility of unrestricted observation of a phenomenon, which is typical for science, but not for religion. It is a prerequisite for such phenomenon to be included into the world view and a special meaning of the thinking effort economy for science. It is observed that particular areas of knowledge hold what in certain respects is an intermediary position between religion and science.

Уверенность в существовании сверхъестественных сил и в их влиянии на человека - это сущность религиозного образа мышления. В статье рассматриваются содержания понятий сверхъестественных реальностей (сил, миров, способностей). Отличие науки от религии связывается со свойственным научному, но не религиозному мышлению требованием возможности произвольного наблюдения явления как необходимого условия его включения в картину мира и особым значением принципа экономии мышления для науки. Отмечено, что некоторые области знаний занимают в определенных отношениях переходное положение между религией и наукой.

Keywords

научный образ мышления, scientific mentality, религиозный образ мышления, unrestricted observation, natural and supernatural forces, thinking effort economy, экономия мышления, произвольное наблюдение, religious mentality, естественные и сверхъестественные силы

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!