Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ SRUC Research Portalarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
SRUC Research Portal
Part of book or chapter of book . 2021
License: CC BY
addClaim

Woodlands

Authors: Coomes, David; Bowditch, Euan; Burton, Vanessa; Chamberlain, Bethany; Donald, Flora; Egedusevic, Martina; Fuentes-Montemayor, E; +6 Authors
Abstract

KEY POINTS1. The United Kingdom’s forests currently store 1.09 billion tonnes of carbon and sequesterabout 4.6% of the country’s total emissions. The UK government’s commitment to plantover 30,000 extra hectares of woodland per year by 2025 offers significant opportunities tomitigate climate change through carbon sequestration, although the full benefits will not befelt before 2050. Depending on the choice of site, species and establishment method, thesenew woodlands could also benefit biodiversity and deliver multiple ecosystem services.2. Large-scale afforestation should avoid peatlands, productive agricultural lands and habitatsof high conservation value, focussing instead on poor-quality grazing land of which thereis more than enough to fulfil government planting commitments. However, this loss ofgrasslands would reduce the UK’s capacity to produce meat and dairy products (unless otherregions were further intensified), which could do more harm than good unless we switchto more vegetable-based diets, if tropical forests were destroyed to create pastures whichsupply the UK with imported meat.3. Small-scale establishment of native woodlands within agricultural landscapes would provideopportunities to reconnect fragments of ancient woodland, protect wildlife, and betterconnect people with nature if made accessible. Natural establishment of woodlands shouldbe encouraged, where appropriate.4. Non-native conifer plantations provide timber and other wood products, reducing the UK’sinternational environmental footprint; conifer plantations can be damaging for nature,but careful planning can reduce that impact and even benefit some species. In order forplantations to meet their potential, adaptation of woodlands and forestry to future hazards isessential. This includes ensuring diversity is increased in plantations, pests and diseases arecontrolled, and creating complex canopy structure.5. Selective harvesting of trees in native woodlands provides a source of fuelwood (i.e. arenewable energy that substitutes for fossil fuels) and other wood products. Some speciesthrive in selectively-logged woodlands, but felling large, old trees and clearing deadwoodis harmful to birds, bats, lichens, invertebrates and fungi that are woodland specialists,so these should be avoided. They are also important carbon stores. The UK would requiredamaging levels of wood extraction to meet its energy demands through home-grownfuelwood.6. Past grant schemes aiming to support woodland creation have rarely met annual plantingtargets due to social factors including bureaucracy, traditional perceptions of landmanagement, and financial viability. Local, and regional participatory approaches are neededto negotiate around different objectives and build collective power for brokering publicpayments for nature-based solutions.

Country
United Kingdom
Related Organizations
Keywords

SDG 13 - Climate Action, SDG 12 - Responsible Consumption and Production, SDG 15 - Life on Land

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Italian National Biodiversity Future Center