
doi: 10.2312/evs.20221089
The visual representation of a graph is crucial in understanding and analyzing its properties. In this empirical study, we examine the effect of different drawing layouts on our perception of graph density. We treat density as an absolute property of the graph and use a Yes-No design, where participants have to decide whether a graph has a given density or not. We compare a simple grid layout with well-known planar and spring layouts. We also introduce an alternative 'improved' grid layout, which reduces the number of crossings while keeping most of the simplicity of the original grid layout. Results show that our 'improved' version of the grid layout facilitated performance on the task, compared to the original one. Moreover, participants were biased into judging graphs as denser when drawn with the original grid layout, while tended to perceive graphs as less dense when drawn with the planar and grid layouts. In contrast to previous studies on graph density perception, this is the first indication that the chosen layout can influence our perception of the graph's density.
Elektra Kypridemou, Michele Zito, and Marco Bertamini
Graphs and Trees
Human centered computing, Perception, CCS Concepts: Human-centered computing --> Graph drawings; Empirical studies in visualization; Computing methodologies --> Perception, Empirical studies in visualization, Computing methodologies, Graph drawings
Human centered computing, Perception, CCS Concepts: Human-centered computing --> Graph drawings; Empirical studies in visualization; Computing methodologies --> Perception, Empirical studies in visualization, Computing methodologies, Graph drawings
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
