
This article presents a performance comparison of two known public key cryptography techniques namely RSA (Rivest–Shamir–Adleman) and El-Gamal algorithms to encrypt/decrypt the speech signals during transferring over open networks. Specifically, this work is divided into two stages. The first stage is enciphering-deciphering the input speech file by employing the RSA method. The second stage is enciphering-deciphering the same input speech file by employing the El-Gamal method. Then, a comparative analysis is performed to test the performance of both cryptosystems using diverse experimental and statistical analyses for the ciphering and deciphering procedures like some known speech quality measures: histogram, spectrogram, correlation, differential, speed performance and noise effect analyses. The analyses outcomes reveal that the RSA and El-Gamal approaches are efficient and adequate for providing high degree of security, confidentiality and reliability. Additionally, the outcomes indicate that the RSA speech cryptosystem outperforms its counterpart the El-Gamal speech cryptosystem in most of ciphering/deciphering speech performance metrics.
El-Gamal algorithm, Encryption/Decryption, Mechanics of engineering. Applied mechanics, Environmental engineering, Speech signal, TA213-215, TA349-359, Asymmetric cryptosystem, TA170-171, TK1-9971, Engineering machinery, tools, and implements, Chemical engineering, RSA algorithm, TP155-156, Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering
El-Gamal algorithm, Encryption/Decryption, Mechanics of engineering. Applied mechanics, Environmental engineering, Speech signal, TA213-215, TA349-359, Asymmetric cryptosystem, TA170-171, TK1-9971, Engineering machinery, tools, and implements, Chemical engineering, RSA algorithm, TP155-156, Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
