
This paper considers algorithm selection for the berth allocation problem (BAP) under algorithmruntime limits. BAP consists in scheduling ships on berths subject to ship ready times and sizeconstraints, for a certain objective function. For the purposes of strategic port capacity planning,BAP must be solved many times in extensive simulations, needed to account for ship traffic andhandling times uncertainties, and alternative terminal designs. The algorithm selection problem(ASP) consists in selecting algorithms with the best performance for a considered application. Wepropose a new method of selecting a portfolio of algorithms that will solve the considered BAPinstances and return good solutions. The portfolio selection is based on the performance on thetraining instances. The performance is measured by the runtime and solution quality. In orderto select the portfolio, a linear program minimizing the solution quality loss, subject to overallruntime limit is used. Thus, the portfolio evolves with the runtime limit, which is a key parameter indesigning the port capacity simulations. For the training and validating datasets, random instancesand real ship traffic logs are used. A portfolio of heuristics is developed which can be used forsolving large instances of BAP, emerging when time horizons of months or years are considered.The evolution of the algorithm portfolios under changing runtime limits is studied. The portfolioabilities to solve new instances are assessed.
Scheduling, algorithm portfolios, [INFO.INFO-RO]Computer Science [cs]/Operations Research [math.OC], quality- runtime trade-off, heuristics, algorithm selection problem, berth allocation problem, [INFO.INFO-RO] Computer Science [cs]/Operations Research [math.OC]
Scheduling, algorithm portfolios, [INFO.INFO-RO]Computer Science [cs]/Operations Research [math.OC], quality- runtime trade-off, heuristics, algorithm selection problem, berth allocation problem, [INFO.INFO-RO] Computer Science [cs]/Operations Research [math.OC]
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 46 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
