Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Cancerarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Cancer
Article . 2022 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY NC ND
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Cancer
Article . 2022
versions View all 5 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Cabozantinib for previously treated radioiodine‐refractory differentiated thyroid cancer: Updated results from the phase 3 COSMIC‐311 trial

Authors: Marcia S. Brose; Bruce G. Robinson; Steven I. Sherman; Barbara Jarzab; Chia‐Chi Lin; Fernanda Vaisman; Ana O. Hoff; +7 Authors

Cabozantinib for previously treated radioiodine‐refractory differentiated thyroid cancer: Updated results from the phase 3 COSMIC‐311 trial

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundAt an interim analysis (median follow‐up, 6.2 months; n = 187), the phase 3 COSMIC‐311 trial met the primary end point of progression‐free survival (PFS): cabozantinib improved PFS versus a placebo (median, not reached vs. 1.9 months; p < .0001) in patients with previously treated radioiodine‐refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (RAIR‐DTC). The results from an exploratory analysis using an extended datacut are presented.MethodsPatients 16 years old or older with RAIR‐DTC who progressed on prior lenvatinib and/or sorafenib were randomized 2:1 to oral cabozantinib tablets (60 mg/day) or a placebo. Placebo patients could cross over to open‐label cabozantinib upon radiographic disease progression. The objective response rate (ORR) in the first 100 randomized patients and the PFS in the intent‐to‐treat population, both according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 by blinded, independent review, were the primary end points.ResultsAt the data cutoff (February 8, 2021), 258 patients had been randomized (cabozantinib, n = 170; placebo, n = 88); the median follow‐up was 10.1 months. The median PFS was 11.0 months (96% confidence interval [CI], 7.4–13.8 months) for cabozantinib and 1.9 months (96% CI, 1.9–3.7 months) for the placebo (hazard ratio, 0.22; 96% CI, 0.15–0.32; p < .0001). The ORR was 11.0% (95% CI, 6.9%–16.9%) versus 0% (95% CI, 0.0%–4.1%) (p = .0003) with one complete response with cabozantinib. Forty placebo patients crossed over to open‐label cabozantinib. Grade 3/4 treatment‐emergent adverse events occurred in 62% and 28% of the cabozantinib‐ and placebo‐treated patients, respectively; the most common were hypertension (12% vs. 2%), palmar–plantar erythrodysesthesia (10% vs. 0%), and fatigue (9% vs. 0%). There were no grade 5 treatment‐related events.ConclusionsAt extended follow‐up, cabozantinib maintained superior efficacy over a placebo in patients with previously treated RAIR‐DTC with no new safety signals.

Keywords

Other subheadings::Other subheadings::Other subheadings::/drug therapy, DISEASES::Neoplasms::Neoplasms by Site::Endocrine Gland Neoplasms::Thyroid Neoplasms, CHEMICALS AND DRUGS::Inorganic Chemicals::Elements::Halogens::Iodine::Iodine Isotopes::Iodine Radioisotopes, Adolescent, Otros calificadores::Otros calificadores::Otros calificadores::/farmacoterapia, Pyridines, Medicaments antineoplàstics - Ús terapèutic, Antineoplastic Agents, Tiroide - Càncer - Tractament, Adenocarcinoma, COMPUESTOS QUÍMICOS Y DROGAS::compuestos inorgánicos::elementos::halógenos::yodo::isótopos del yodo::radioisótopos del yodo, Iodine Radioisotopes, COMPUESTOS QUÍMICOS Y DROGAS::acciones y usos químicos::acciones farmacológicas::usos terapéuticos::antineoplásicos, Isòtops radioactius en farmacologia, ENFERMEDADES::neoplasias::neoplasias por localización::neoplasias de las glándulas endocrinas::neoplasias de la tiroides, Humans, Anilides, Thyroid Neoplasms, ORIGINAL ARTICLES, CHEMICALS AND DRUGS::Chemical Actions and Uses::Pharmacologic Actions::Therapeutic Uses::Antineoplastic Agents

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    51
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 1%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 1%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
51
Top 1%
Top 10%
Top 1%
Green
hybrid
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research