Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ LUMC Scholarly Publi...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
Article . 2024 . Peer-reviewed
License: OUP Standard Publication Reuse
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
Article . 2024
License: taverne
Data sources: Pure Amsterdam UMC
versions View all 7 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Genetic testing in a national cohort of adults with chronic kidney disease of unknown origin

Authors: Amber de Haan; Mark Eijgelsheim; Liffert Vogt; Ewout J Hoorn; Joris I Rotmans; Gijs Fortrie; Roos F J Marsman; +12 Authors

Genetic testing in a national cohort of adults with chronic kidney disease of unknown origin

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Chronic kidney disease (CKD) remains unexplained in at least 20% of patients. Massively parallel sequencing (MPS) can be a valuable diagnostic tool in patients with unexplained CKD, but prospective data from routine clinical practice are limited. We aimed to determine the diagnostic yield and relevance of MPS-based gene panel testing in patients with unexplained CKD in a real-world context. We additionally examined barriers to implementation of genetic testing. Methods In this prospective cohort study, we recruited patients with unexplained CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 ml/min/1.73 m2 without underlying clinical diagnosis) with onset at <50 years of age who underwent MPS-based multigene panel testing from 11 academic and non-academic hospitals across the Netherlands. In patients with a (likely) pathogenic variant, we verified that the variant likely explained the clinical phenotype. A nationwide online survey was sent to all Dutch nephrologists and residents to investigate potential barriers for gene panel testing. Results A diagnostic variant was identified in 59/340 participants (17%). Most common diagnostic variants were in NPHP1 (13 patients), COL4A3 (12 patients), COL4A4 (5 patients), COL4A5 (6 patients) and PAX2 (5 patients). A genetic diagnosis led to at least one clinical consequence in 73% of patients. Main barriers reported by Dutch nephrologists (N = 71) included genetic illiteracy (53%), difficulties with test selection (51%) and a lack of time (43%). Conclusions MPS-based multigene panel testing yielded a genetic diagnosis in 17% of patients with unexplained CKD. Our findings support the relevance of MPS in the diagnostic workup of adults with unexplained CKD with onset at <50 years of age. Additionally, our results underline the need to improve genetic education among nephrologists to better the implementation of MPS-based diagnostic testing in clinical practice.

Keywords

Male, Adult, massively parallel sequencing, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Chronic/genetics, Cohort Studies, diagnostic yield, Humans, genetics, Female, Prospective Studies, Renal Insufficiency, exome sequencing, chronic kidney disease, Genetic Testing/methods, Netherlands, Glomerular Filtration Rate, Follow-Up Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Top 10%
Average
Average
Green
hybrid