
Since the insulation volume of medium-frequency transformers (MFTs) typically constitutes a significant fraction of the overall transformer volume, design routines focusing on optimizing insulation are crucial. Such optimization requires fast and accurate electric field computations in several critical regions of the MFT, making the choice of effective computation methods essential. This paper compares suitable methods, including the Schwarz-Christoffel transformation (SCT), the charge simulation method (CSM), and commonly used analytical approaches, by benchmarking them against nearly 4000 finite element analysis (FEA) simulations. Each method's error is analyzed, and a sensitivity study is performed to define the parameter ranges where each method yields accurate results. The CSM is found to provide the most accurate field computation (< 5% error) across all examined critical regions. However, to compensate for its increased computation time for geometries with rectangular conductors, combining the CSM with the SCT-which is approximately 10 times faster-is recommended to achieve optimal performance.
IEEE Open Journal of Power Electronics, 6
ISSN:2644-1314
Medium-frequency transformer, medium-frequency transformer, Converter optimization, insulation optimization, Schwarz-Christoffel transformation, insulation design, Electric field computation, TK1-9971, electric field computation, Insulation design, converter optimization, Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering, Charge simulation method, Insulation optimization
Medium-frequency transformer, medium-frequency transformer, Converter optimization, insulation optimization, Schwarz-Christoffel transformation, insulation design, Electric field computation, TK1-9971, electric field computation, Insulation design, converter optimization, Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering, Charge simulation method, Insulation optimization
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
