
pmid: 37839504
At the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, delayed umbilical cord clamping (CC) at birth may have been commonly discouraged despite a lack of convincing evidence of mother-to-neonate SARS-CoV-2 transmission. We aimed to systematically review guidelines, and reports of practice and to analyze associations between timing of CC and mother-to-neonate SARS-CoV-2 transmission during the early phases of the pandemic.Major databases were searched from December 1, 2019, to July 20, 2021.studies and guidelines describing CC practice in women with SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy until 2 postnatal days, giving birth to live-born neonates.no extractable data. Two reviewers independently screened studies for eligibility and assessed study quality. Pooled prevalence rates were calculated.Forty-eight studies (1476 neonates) and 40 guidelines were included. Delayed CC was recommended in 70.0% of the guidelines. Nevertheless, delayed CC was reported less often than early CC: 262/1476 (17.8%) vs 511/1476 (34.6%). Neonatal SARS-CoV-2 positivity rates were similar following delayed (1.2%) and early CC (1.3%). Most SARS-CoV-2 transmissions (93.3%) occurred in utero.Delayed CC did not seem to increase mother-to-neonate SARS-CoV-2 transmission. Due to its benefits, it should be encouraged even in births where the mother has a SARS-CoV-2 infection.Prospero CRD42020199500.
SARS-CoV-2, Infant, Newborn, COVID-19/transmission*, COVID-19, Infectious and parasitic diseases, RC109-216, Newborn, Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical, Pregnancy, Umbilical Cord Clamping, Humans, Umbilical cord clamping, Female, Pregnancy Complications, Infectious, Umbilical cord, Delivery, Pandemics
SARS-CoV-2, Infant, Newborn, COVID-19/transmission*, COVID-19, Infectious and parasitic diseases, RC109-216, Newborn, Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical, Pregnancy, Umbilical Cord Clamping, Humans, Umbilical cord clamping, Female, Pregnancy Complications, Infectious, Umbilical cord, Delivery, Pandemics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
