
Heat exchangers are critical components widely used in various industries such as chemical processing, automotive, and HVAC. The evaluation and optimization of heat exchanger design criteria play a vital role in improving industrial applications. Tree-based machine learning models offer a powerful alternative to time-consuming numerical solutions by enabling optimization and classification predictions for problems involving small, medium, or large datasets. This study aims to analyze heat exchanger design criteria using tree-based machine learning models and to identify the most suitable model for each design parameter. As a result, it has been evaluated that the XGBoost model provides effective solutions for design criteria such as heat transfer rate, safety, and reliability; the AdaBoost model is more suitable for criteria such as exchanger type and ease of maintenance; and the RF model performs well for cost and pumping power. It is anticipated that in the future, analyzing heat exchanger design parameters using various machine learning approaches will enable the development of more cost-effective and efficient heat exchangers.
Heat Exchangers;Machine Learning;Tree Models;Design Criteria, Computational Methods in Fluid Flow, Heat and Mass Transfer (Incl. Computational Fluid Dynamics), Isı Değiştiriciler;Makine Öğrenmesi;Ağaç Modelleri;Tasarım Kriteri, Akışkan Akışı, Isı ve Kütle Transferinde Hesaplamalı Yöntemler (Hesaplamalı Akışkanlar Dinamiği Dahil)
Heat Exchangers;Machine Learning;Tree Models;Design Criteria, Computational Methods in Fluid Flow, Heat and Mass Transfer (Incl. Computational Fluid Dynamics), Isı Değiştiriciler;Makine Öğrenmesi;Ağaç Modelleri;Tasarım Kriteri, Akışkan Akışı, Isı ve Kütle Transferinde Hesaplamalı Yöntemler (Hesaplamalı Akışkanlar Dinamiği Dahil)
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
