Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao International Journa...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Article . 2024 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
https://doi.org/10.22541/au.17...
Article . 2024 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
https://doi.org/10.22541/au.17...
Article . 2024 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 7 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Maternal genetic risk factors for spontaneous preterm birth: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Authors: Tea Mladenić; Anita Barišić; Nina Pereza; Saša Ostojić; Borut Peterlin; Sanja Dević Pavlić;

Maternal genetic risk factors for spontaneous preterm birth: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundDespite various genomic approaches used in prior studies investigating the association of maternal genetic variability with spontaneous preterm birth (sPTB), results show inconsistency and contradictions.ObjectivesTo conduct a systematic review of studies analyzing the association between maternal genetic variants and sPTB, evaluate retrieved studies based on selection criteria, classify studies into hypothesis‐based and hypothesis‐free, and perform a meta‐analysis to identify the strongest associations.Search strategyPubMed, Scopus, and reference lists were searched until October 2024.Selection criteriaEnglish‐language, case–control, cross‐sectional, and prospective cohort studies examining the association between maternal genetic variations and sPTB were included.Data collection and analysisData on authors, publication year, ethnicity, genes/variants, P values, study type, sample size, inclusion criteria, and methods were collected. The association strength was estimated using odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals.ResultsEighty‐one studies met eligibility criteria: 73 utilized a hypothesis‐based and 14 a hypothesis‐free approach. Thirty‐five studies qualified for a meta‐analysis, revealing a significant association in tumor necrosis factor α (rs1800629) gene for alleles and additive and recessive genetic models (P ≤ 0.05). From the hypothesis‐free approach, 13 genes reached global significance in association with sPTB (P < 5 × 10−8).ConclusionsNo single gene or variant was consistently associated with sPTB risk among studies. Hypothesis‐based analyses highlighted tumor necrosis factor α (rs1800629) as a modest signal, while hypothesis‐free approaches identified 13 genes with genome‐wide significance, pointing to new research directions in understanding sPTB genetics.

Keywords

Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha, preterm birth, premature birth, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Pregnancy, Risk Factors, genetic association study, spontaneous preterm birth, Humans, Premature Birth, Female, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, gene, exome sequencing, genome‐wide association study

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Top 10%
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!