
handle: 21.11116/0000-000D-99FC-B
Abstract Participation payments are used in many transactions about which people know little but can learn more: incentives for medical trial participation, signing bonuses for job applicants, or price rebates on consumer durables. Who opts into the transaction when given such incentives? We theoretically and experimentally identify a composition effect whereby incentives disproportionately increase participation among those for whom learning is harder. Moreover, these individuals use less information to decide whether to participate, which makes disappointment more likely. The learning-based composition effect is stronger in settings in which information acquisition is more difficult.
rational inattention, 000, 330, ddc:000, ddc:330, incentives, screening, selection, 330 Economics, social sciences (miscellaneous), 10007 Department of Economics, composition effect, evaluability, Economics and econometrics, ddc: ddc:000, ddc: ddc:330
rational inattention, 000, 330, ddc:000, ddc:330, incentives, screening, selection, 330 Economics, social sciences (miscellaneous), 10007 Department of Economics, composition effect, evaluability, Economics and econometrics, ddc: ddc:000, ddc: ddc:330
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
