
Abstract Purpose Cochlear implantation is a prevalent remedy for severe-to-profound hearing loss. Optimising outcomes and hearing preservation, and minimising insertion trauma, require precise electrode placement. Objective monitoring during the insertion process can provide valuable insights and enhance surgical precision. This study assesses the feasibility and performance of an impedance-based method for monitoring electrode insertion, compared to the surgeon’s feedback. Methods The study utilised the Insertion Monitoring Tool (IMT) research software, allowing for real-time measurement of impedance and evoked compound action potential (eCAP) during electrode insertion in 20 patient implantations. This enabled an impedance-based method to continuously assess the status of each electrode during the insertion process. The feasibility and performance was evaluated and compared to the surgeon’s feedback approach. eCAP measurements focused merely on feasibility without searching specific responses. Results The IMT demonstrated feasibility in measuring real-time impedances and eCAP during the insertion of the electrode array. The impedance-based method exhibited potential for accurately monitoring the insertion depth with a high success rate. However, further development is needed to improve the number of usable contacts. Conclusions Objective monitoring with the impedance-based method shows promise as a valuable tool to enhance the precision of cochlear implant electrode insertion respecting insertion distance estimation. The IMT research software proved feasible in recording real-time impedances and eCAP during electrode insertion. While this impedance-based method exhibits high success rates, further improvements are required to optimise the number of usable contacts. This study highlights the potential of objective monitoring techniques to enhance cochlear implantation outcomes.
Male, Adult, Adolescent, Adolescent [MeSH] ; Female [MeSH] ; Aged [MeSH] ; Adult [MeSH] ; Humans [MeSH] ; Electrodes, Implanted [MeSH] ; Real-time measurement ; Middle Aged [MeSH] ; Cochlear implant ; Evoked Potentials, Auditory/physiology [MeSH] ; Feasibility Studies [MeSH] ; Otology ; Electrode impedance ; Cochlear Implantation/methods [MeSH] ; Male [MeSH] ; Electric Impedance [MeSH] ; Young Adult [MeSH] ; Cochlear Implants [MeSH] ; Child [MeSH] ; Insertion speed ; Monitoring, Intraoperative/methods [MeSH] ; Child, Preschool [MeSH] ; Monitoring, Intraoperative/instrumentation [MeSH], Otology, Middle Aged, Cochlear Implantation, Electrodes, Implanted, Young Adult, Cochlear Implants, Child, Preschool, Monitoring, Intraoperative, Electric Impedance, Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Humans, Feasibility Studies, Female, Human medicine, Child, Otology ; Cochlear implant ; Electrode impedance ; Insertion speed ; Real-time measurement, Aged, ddc: ddc:
Male, Adult, Adolescent, Adolescent [MeSH] ; Female [MeSH] ; Aged [MeSH] ; Adult [MeSH] ; Humans [MeSH] ; Electrodes, Implanted [MeSH] ; Real-time measurement ; Middle Aged [MeSH] ; Cochlear implant ; Evoked Potentials, Auditory/physiology [MeSH] ; Feasibility Studies [MeSH] ; Otology ; Electrode impedance ; Cochlear Implantation/methods [MeSH] ; Male [MeSH] ; Electric Impedance [MeSH] ; Young Adult [MeSH] ; Cochlear Implants [MeSH] ; Child [MeSH] ; Insertion speed ; Monitoring, Intraoperative/methods [MeSH] ; Child, Preschool [MeSH] ; Monitoring, Intraoperative/instrumentation [MeSH], Otology, Middle Aged, Cochlear Implantation, Electrodes, Implanted, Young Adult, Cochlear Implants, Child, Preschool, Monitoring, Intraoperative, Electric Impedance, Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Humans, Feasibility Studies, Female, Human medicine, Child, Otology ; Cochlear implant ; Electrode impedance ; Insertion speed ; Real-time measurement, Aged, ddc: ddc:
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
