
The paper illustrates the solution of the problem of choosing methods of quality control of manufacturing parts and assemblies of power equipment using a fuzzy logic device. The main methods of non-destructive testing for the detection of surface and internal defects are considered, as well as the main indicators of quality of metal products. The types of metal defects and welded joints are inspected. The description of the equipment and means of control for detection of defects is executed. The sequence and methods of quality control by ultrasonic, capillary and magnetic powder methods of control are described in detail. The results of quality control of parts during production and during their operation are obtained. The analysis of the revealed defects is carried out. An example of using an integrated approach to control is given. The obtained results of control of the percentage of coincidence of detection of defects on the product are analyzed. Comprehensive quality control was performed by visual, ultrasonic, capillary and magnetic powder methods of non-destructive testing to determine the percentage of coincidences of defects. By creating a heuristic analyzer based on the interface of the fuzzy logic system Fuzzy Logic Toolbox of the Matlab program, an example of determining a combination of non-destructive testing methods for quality control of a steam turbine bearing liner is considered. Computer simulation according to the Mamdani algorithm is carried out, which consists of fazzification with determination of ranges of change of input values for each example, task of distribution functions for each input parameter; calculation of rules based on the adequacy of the model; defuzzification with the transition from linguistic terms to quantitative assessment and graphical construction of the response surface. The simulation made it possible to determine the optimal combination of non-destructive testing methods, which provides the highest quality of defect detection in the steam turbine bearing liner.
defect, Information theory, 53.088, объект контроля, эвристический анализатор, евристичний аналізатор, дефазифікація, фазифікація, QA76.75-76.765, фаззификация, fuzzification, неруйнівний контроль, defuzzification, Computer software, нечеткая логика, quality control, Q350-390, дефаззификация, heuristic analyzer, 620.179.1, non-destructive testing, контроль качества, нечітка логіка, 621.681.2.08, control object, неразрушающий контроль, об’єкт контролю, контроль якості, fuzzy logic, дефект
defect, Information theory, 53.088, объект контроля, эвристический анализатор, евристичний аналізатор, дефазифікація, фазифікація, QA76.75-76.765, фаззификация, fuzzification, неруйнівний контроль, defuzzification, Computer software, нечеткая логика, quality control, Q350-390, дефаззификация, heuristic analyzer, 620.179.1, non-destructive testing, контроль качества, нечітка логіка, 621.681.2.08, control object, неразрушающий контроль, об’єкт контролю, контроль якості, fuzzy logic, дефект
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
