
In practical problems, which can be stated in the form of multi objective programming problem, we have usually a large set of efficient solutions. So, which solution from this set should be taken, appears as a natural question here. In the paper we propose some sustainable principles and simple numerical method for such choice. The method respects aspirations and priorities of decision makers and enables iterations for possible improvement of the solution. In this way decision makers can clearly understand why a particular solution is obtained and when and how it can be improved. The features of the method are explained by a practical example. An applications to bilevel programming problems are also presented, where the both side mapping, between the set of efficient solutions and the set of all possible priorities, is shown. It is illustrated in detail through several linear and nonlinear examples.
Efficient -olution, aspiration, Multi-objective-programming-problem ; Efficient -olution ; Priority ; Apiration ; Bilevel-rogramming-problem, bilevel programming problem, Operations research and management science, Apiration, priority, Multi-objective-programming-problem, efficient solution, Priority, multi objective programming problem, Bilevel-rogramming-problem
Efficient -olution, aspiration, Multi-objective-programming-problem ; Efficient -olution ; Priority ; Apiration ; Bilevel-rogramming-problem, bilevel programming problem, Operations research and management science, Apiration, priority, Multi-objective-programming-problem, efficient solution, Priority, multi objective programming problem, Bilevel-rogramming-problem
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
