
pmid: 30479086
pmc: PMC6304401
To explore current practice and influencing factors on adoption of the opportunistic salpingectomy (OS), particularly regarding the decision making, to eventually enhance the development and implementation of clear guidelines.This nationwide cross-sectional survey study was conducted in all hospitals in the Netherlands. An anonymous online survey was sent to gynecologists with special interest in gynecological oncology, gynecological endoscopy or urogynecology and all Dutch gynecology trainees. The survey mainly focused on current practice regarding OS and identification of influencing factors on the level of innovation, organization, healthcare professional and individual patient.The response rate was 348 out of 597 gynecologists (58.3%) and 142 out of 340 trainees (41.8%). Current practice of discussing and performing the OS varied widely, with ovarian cancer (OC) risk reduction as most important supportive factor on innovation level. Supportive factors on the level of organization and healthcare provider were; working in a non-training hospital, knowledge of current literature and extensive work experience (in years and annual number of hysterectomies). On individual patient level, a vaginal approach of hysterectomy, negative family history for OC and the presence of firm adhesions were suppressive factors for the OS.In this study we evaluated the current practice regarding the opportunistic salpingectomy in the Netherlands and identified influencing factors on different levels to raise awareness and attribute to development of a targeted implementation strategy, on both national and international level.
Radboudumc 18: Healthcare improvement science RIHS: Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Clinical Decision-Making, Radboudumc 17: Women's cancers RIHS: Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Ovarian Epithelial/prevention & control, Practice Patterns, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Hysterectomy, Risk Assessment, Ovarian Neoplasms/prevention & control, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data, Salpingectomy, Gynaecology - Radboud University Medical Center, Surveys and Questionnaires, Hysterectomy, Vaginal, Ovary/surgery, Humans, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Netherlands, Ovarian Neoplasms, Practice, Salpingectomy/psychology, Health Knowledge, Carcinoma, Ovary, Prophylactic Surgical Procedures, Radboudumc 17: Women's cancers RIMLS: Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, IQ Healthcare - Radboud University Medical Center, Cross-Sectional Studies, Vaginal/statistics & numerical data, Gynecology, Attitudes, Gynecology/statistics & numerical data, Original Article, Female, Prophylactic Surgical Procedures/psychology
Radboudumc 18: Healthcare improvement science RIHS: Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Clinical Decision-Making, Radboudumc 17: Women's cancers RIHS: Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Ovarian Epithelial/prevention & control, Practice Patterns, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Hysterectomy, Risk Assessment, Ovarian Neoplasms/prevention & control, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data, Salpingectomy, Gynaecology - Radboud University Medical Center, Surveys and Questionnaires, Hysterectomy, Vaginal, Ovary/surgery, Humans, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Netherlands, Ovarian Neoplasms, Practice, Salpingectomy/psychology, Health Knowledge, Carcinoma, Ovary, Prophylactic Surgical Procedures, Radboudumc 17: Women's cancers RIMLS: Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, IQ Healthcare - Radboud University Medical Center, Cross-Sectional Studies, Vaginal/statistics & numerical data, Gynecology, Attitudes, Gynecology/statistics & numerical data, Original Article, Female, Prophylactic Surgical Procedures/psychology
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 15 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
