
doi: 10.1002/ece3.71801
ABSTRACTAmphibians are increasingly threatened by human activities, with rice straw burning emerging as a significant yet underexplored hazard. This practice may release harmful polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), disrupt ecosystems, and affect amphibians. However, the impact on tadpole microbiota and development remains unclear. This study used scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and chemical analysis to characterize straw ash toxicity, assessed rice straw aqueous extracts of ash (AEA; 0, 0.75, 1.5, 3, and 6 g L−1) on Rana dybowskii tadpoles survival, growth, and development, and analyzed skin and gut microbiota via Illumina sequencing. Within the AEA, 10 varieties of PAHs exhibited higher quantities, including acenaphthylene, acenaphthene, and anthracene. SEM revealed irregular, porous, layered ash particles. Higher AEA concentrations reduced survival, delayed development, and affected body mass. The alpha diversity of both skin and gut microbiota significantly varied among groups. Beta diversity analyses indicated substantial shifts in microbial community structure with increased AEA concentrations. Linear discriminant analysis (LEfSe) identified microbial taxa enrichment and shifts, including the increase of potentially pathogenic genera such as Citrobacter and Yersinia in high‐concentration groups. BugBase analysis showed significant phenotypic changes in microbial communities. Our findings expose rice straw ash as a silent, global toxin that disrupts amphibian microbiota, growth, and survival—redefining routine straw burning as a planetary biodiversity hazard and urging immediate, sustainable reforms to protect wetland ecosystems.
ecosystem stability, Ecology, microbial diversity, microbiota, straw burning, ecological conservation, QH540-549.5, Research Article
ecosystem stability, Ecology, microbial diversity, microbiota, straw burning, ecological conservation, QH540-549.5, Research Article
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
