
AbstractFunctional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) maps cerebral activation in response to stimuli but this activation is often difficult to detect, especially in low‐signal contexts and single‐subject studies. Accurate activation detection can be guided by the fact that very few voxels are, in reality, truly activated and that these voxels are spatially localized, but it is challenging to incorporate both these facts. We address these twin challenges to single‐subject and low‐signal fMRI by developing a computationally feasible and methodologically sound model‐based approach, implemented in the R package MixfMRI, that bounds the a priori expected proportion of activated voxels while also incorporating spatial context. An added benefit of our methodology is the ability to distinguish voxels and regions having different intensities of activation. Our suggested approach is evaluated in realistic two‐ and three‐dimensional simulation experiments as well as on multiple real‐world datasets. Finally, the value of our suggested approach in low‐signal and single‐subject fMRI studies is illustrated on a sports imagination experiment that is often used to detect awareness and improve treatment in patients in persistent vegetative state (PVS). Our ability to reliably distinguish activation in this experiment potentially opens the door to the adoption of fMRI as a clinical tool for the improved treatment and therapy of PVS survivors and other patients.
FOS: Computer and information sciences, J.3, DegreeDisciplines::Life Sciences::Research Methods in Life Sciences, G.3, 610, Machine Learning (stat.ML), Statistics - Applications, Statistics - Computation, 62P10 (Primary), 62P30, 62E20, 62H10, 62H35, Methodology (stat.ME), Statistics - Machine Learning, 616, Humans, Computer Simulation, Applications (stat.AP), expectation gathering maximization, probabilistic threshold-free cluster enhancement, Statistics - Methodology, Research Articles, Computation (stat.CO), I.4.0, Brain Mapping, algorithm, persistent vegetative state, traumatic brain injury, I.4.6, Brain, alternating partial expectation conditional maximization algorithm, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, DegreeDisciplines::Physical Sciences and Mathematics::Statistics and Probability, I.2.1, cluster thresholding, spatial mixture model, G.3; I.2.1; I.4.0; I.4.6; J.3, Flanker task, MixfMRI, false discovery rate, Algorithms
FOS: Computer and information sciences, J.3, DegreeDisciplines::Life Sciences::Research Methods in Life Sciences, G.3, 610, Machine Learning (stat.ML), Statistics - Applications, Statistics - Computation, 62P10 (Primary), 62P30, 62E20, 62H10, 62H35, Methodology (stat.ME), Statistics - Machine Learning, 616, Humans, Computer Simulation, Applications (stat.AP), expectation gathering maximization, probabilistic threshold-free cluster enhancement, Statistics - Methodology, Research Articles, Computation (stat.CO), I.4.0, Brain Mapping, algorithm, persistent vegetative state, traumatic brain injury, I.4.6, Brain, alternating partial expectation conditional maximization algorithm, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, DegreeDisciplines::Physical Sciences and Mathematics::Statistics and Probability, I.2.1, cluster thresholding, spatial mixture model, G.3; I.2.1; I.4.0; I.4.6; J.3, Flanker task, MixfMRI, false discovery rate, Algorithms
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
