
Abstract Purpose To benchmark palliative care practices in neurooncology centers across Germany, evaluating the variability in palliative care integration, timing, and involvement in tumor board discussions. This study aims to identify gaps in care and contribute to the discourse on optimal palliative care strategies. Methods A survey targeting both German Cancer Society-certified and non-certified university neurooncology centers was conducted to explore palliative care frameworks and practices for neurooncological patients. The survey included questions on palliative care department availability, involvement in tumor boards, timing of palliative care integration, and use of standardized screening tools for assessing palliative burden and psycho-oncological distress. Results Of 57 centers contacted, 46 responded (81% response rate). Results indicate a dedicated palliative care department in 76.1% of centers, with palliative specialists participating in tumor board discussions at 34.8% of centers. Variability was noted in the initiation of palliative care, with early integration at the diagnosis stage in only 30.4% of centers. The survey highlighted a significant lack of standardized spiritual care assessments and minimal use of advanced care planning. Discrepancies were observed in the documentation and treatment of palliative care symptoms and social complaints, underscoring the need for comprehensive care approaches. Conclusion The study highlights a diverse landscape of palliative care provision within German neurooncology centers, underscoring the need for more standardized practices and early integration of palliative care. It suggests the necessity for standardized protocols and guidelines to enhance palliative care's quality and uniformity, ultimately improving patient-centered care in neurooncology.
ddc:610, Surveys and Questionnaires [MeSH] ; Benchmarking [MeSH] ; Humans [MeSH] ; Neurooncology ; Palliative care ; Quality of life ; Research ; Germany [MeSH] ; Palliative Care/standards [MeSH] ; Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards [MeSH] ; Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics ; Brain Neoplasms/therapy [MeSH] ; Medical Oncology/standards [MeSH], Brain Neoplasms, Research, Palliative Care, Medizin, Medical Oncology, Benchmarking, Germany, Surveys and Questionnaires, Humans, Practice Patterns, Physicians'
ddc:610, Surveys and Questionnaires [MeSH] ; Benchmarking [MeSH] ; Humans [MeSH] ; Neurooncology ; Palliative care ; Quality of life ; Research ; Germany [MeSH] ; Palliative Care/standards [MeSH] ; Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards [MeSH] ; Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics ; Brain Neoplasms/therapy [MeSH] ; Medical Oncology/standards [MeSH], Brain Neoplasms, Research, Palliative Care, Medizin, Medical Oncology, Benchmarking, Germany, Surveys and Questionnaires, Humans, Practice Patterns, Physicians'
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
