
With the development of deep learning (DL) frameworks in the field of pattern recognition, DL-based algorithms have outperformed handcrafted feature (HF)-based ones in various applications. However, there still exist several challenges in applying the DL framework to a radar-based people counting (RPC) task: The powerful representation capacity of a deep neural network (DNN) learns not only the desired human-induced components but also unwanted nuisance factors, and available data for RPC is usually insufficient to train a huge-sized DNN, leading to an increased possibility of overfitting. To tackle this problem, we propose novel solutions for the successful application of the DL framework to the RPC task from various perspectives. First, we newly formulate the preprocessing pipelines to transform the raw received radar echoes into a better-matched form for a DNN. Second, we devise a novel backbone architecture that reflects the spatiotemporal characteristics of the radar signals, while relieving the burden on training through a parameter efficient design. Finally, an unsupervised pre-training process and a newly defined loss function are proposed for further stabilized network convergence. Several experimental results using real measured data show that the proposed scheme enables an effective utilization of DL for RPC, achieving a significant performance improvement compared to conventional RPC methods.
CROWD, convolutional autoencoder (CAE), impulse radio ultra-wideband (IR-UWB) radar, radar-based people counting (RPC), Radar, Internet of Things, bidirectional recurrent neural network (Bi-RNN), TRACKING, Clutter, Deep learning (DL), SMART CITIES, Feature extraction, Training, Radar clutter, Radar cross-sections
CROWD, convolutional autoencoder (CAE), impulse radio ultra-wideband (IR-UWB) radar, radar-based people counting (RPC), Radar, Internet of Things, bidirectional recurrent neural network (Bi-RNN), TRACKING, Clutter, Deep learning (DL), SMART CITIES, Feature extraction, Training, Radar clutter, Radar cross-sections
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 25 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
