
Advance care planning (ACP) is increasingly regarded as the best way to optimise end-of-life (EOL) care. Studies have examined a multitude of factors impacting on the lagging uptake of ACP. In the current study, we specifically focused on patient factors related to the uptake of ACP in adult cancer patients.A scoping review was conducted, for which we searched the CINAHL, Cochrane, MEDLINE and PsycINFO databases (January 2013-December 2018). Studies exploring patient-related factors influencing the uptake of ACP in cancer patients were eligible for inclusion.Eleven papers and two overarching themes: person-related (e.g. socio-demographic) factors and "comprehension and awareness," were identified. White, well-educated patients with a support network were more likely to be involved in ACP. However, there is limited comprehension and awareness among cancer patients regarding ACP.The identified themes warrant a tailored approach to ACP. With regard to person-related factors, the existing body of knowledge on health literacy, disparities and shared decision-making should be used when designing strategies to improve ACP uptake. Further, our findings regarding "comprehension and awareness" suggest that ACP should not be limited to a narrow process without acknowledging the complexity surrounding personalised cancer care near the EOL.
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Physician-Patient Relations, Terminal Care, Science & Technology, Marital Status, Oncology and carcinogenesis, Nursing, Advance Care Planning, Health Care Sciences & Services, Oncology, Cost of Illness, Socioeconomic Factors, Neoplasms, Ethnicity, Humans, Patient Participation, Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Physician-Patient Relations, Terminal Care, Science & Technology, Marital Status, Oncology and carcinogenesis, Nursing, Advance Care Planning, Health Care Sciences & Services, Oncology, Cost of Illness, Socioeconomic Factors, Neoplasms, Ethnicity, Humans, Patient Participation, Life Sciences & Biomedicine
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 45 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
