Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ YUHSpace (Yonsei Uni...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography
Article . 2013 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Discrepancy Between Preoperative Imaging and Surgical Findings in Patients With Advanced Ovarian Cancer

A Study of Initial False-Negative Lesions
Authors: Seok Min, Ko; Dae Chul, Jung; Young Taik, Oh; Sun Ho, Kim; Sokbom, Kang;

Discrepancy Between Preoperative Imaging and Surgical Findings in Patients With Advanced Ovarian Cancer

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the patterns of erroneous interpretation of preoperative computed tomography (CT) for detection of peritoneal lesions in advanced ovarian cancer.Between 2007 and 2011, 148 patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IIIC-IV ovarian cancer, who underwent multi-detector-row CT before primary cytoreduction, were enrolled. We reviewed the preoperative CT and compared the findings with the surgical findings. For the discrepant cases, false-negative cases were reevaluated after revealing of surgical findings and were categorized as either absence or presence of lesion (missed case). We performed region-based comparisons according to predefined peritoneal lesion locations.Sixty-eight false-negative cases were identified, of which 43 were revealed to be initially missed cases. The most common locations were found to be the small-bowel mesentery (21%), subdiaphragmatic space (19%), and porta hepatis (16%).The missed peritoneal implants commonly resided in the same sites of preoperative imaging criteria that could predict suboptimal primary cytoreduction.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Ovarian Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging*, Prostheses and Implants/statistics & numerical data*, 610, Risk Assessment, Sensitivity and Specificity, 618, Preoperative Care, Republic of Korea, Prevalence, Humans, False Negative Reactions, Retrospective Studies, Ovarian Neoplasms, Ovarian Neoplasms/diagnosis*, Reproducibility of Results, Prostheses and Implants, Peritoneum/diagnostic imaging*, Radiography, Female, Ovarian Neoplasms/epidemiology, Republic of Korea/epidemiology, Peritoneum/surgery*, Peritoneum

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    9
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
9
Average
Average
Average
Green
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research