
arXiv: 2312.02332
Computing the connected components of a graph is a fundamental problem in algorithmic graph theory. A major question in this area is whether we can compute connected components in $o(\log n)$ parallel time. Recent works showed an affirmative answer in the Massively Parallel Computation (MPC) model for a wide class of graphs. Specifically, Behnezhad et al. (FOCS'19) showed that connected components can be computed in $O(\log d + \log \log n)$ rounds in the MPC model. More recently, Liu et al. (SPAA'20) showed that the same result can be achieved in the standard PRAM model but their result incurs $Θ((m+n) \cdot (\log d + \log \log n))$ work which is sub-optimal. In this paper, we show that for graphs that contain \emph{well-connected} components, we can compute connected components on a PRAM in sub-logarithmic parallel time with \emph{optimal}, i.e., $O(m+n)$ total work. Specifically, our algorithm achieves $O(\log(1/λ) + \log \log n)$ parallel time with high probability, where $λ$ is the minimum spectral gap of any connected component in the input graph. The algorithm requires no prior knowledge on $λ$. Additionally, based on the \textsc{2-Cycle} Conjecture we provide a time lower bound of $Ω(\log(1/λ))$ for solving connected components on a PRAM with $O(m+n)$ total memory when $λ\le (1/\log n)^c$, giving conditional optimality to the running time of our algorithm as a parameter of $λ$.
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Data Structures and Algorithms, Data Structures and Algorithms (cs.DS), F.2.2
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Data Structures and Algorithms, Data Structures and Algorithms (cs.DS), F.2.2
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
