
pmid: 7928781
Streptococcus suis was the most frequent Streptococcus spp. in pig tonsils, followed by the beta‐haemolytic porcine ‘equisimilis’ecovar of Strep. dysgalactiae. The intestinal streptococcal flora was composed of Strep. bovis, Strep. hyointestinalis and Strep. suis. Many of these intestinal Strep. suis belonged to a beta‐glucuronidase‐negative biotype which is infrequent in lesions. Nearly half of the strains presumptively identified as Strep. alactolyticus produced acid from lactose. This species was not found in tonsils and intestines but was about equally prevalent as Strep. hyointestinalis in pig faeces and rectal swabs. Other streptococci were rare in this material. Enterococci were much less frequently identified than streptococci in tonsils and faeces. In intestinal samples Enterococcus faecalis, Ent. faecium, Ent. hirae and Ent. cecorum were most frequently found. In faeces Ent. faecium was the most prevalent enterococcus. The characteristics of the less well known species Strep. alactolyticus and Strep. hyointestinalis are described in detail, and guidelines for their differentiation from Strep. bovis and Strep. suis given.
Enterococcus/classification, Feces/microbiology, Swine, Palatine Tonsil, Palatine Tonsil/microbiology, Streptococcus, Gram-Positive Cocci/classification, Intestines/microbiology, Swine/microbiology, Bacterial Typing Techniques, Gram-Positive Cocci, Intestines, Feces, Streptococcus/classification, Animals, Enterococcus
Enterococcus/classification, Feces/microbiology, Swine, Palatine Tonsil, Palatine Tonsil/microbiology, Streptococcus, Gram-Positive Cocci/classification, Intestines/microbiology, Swine/microbiology, Bacterial Typing Techniques, Gram-Positive Cocci, Intestines, Feces, Streptococcus/classification, Animals, Enterococcus
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 85 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
