
arXiv: 2008.04459
Abstract As quantum computing advances rapidly, guaranteeing the security of cryptographic protocols resistant to quantum attacks is paramount. Some leading candidate cryptosystems use the learning with errors (LWE) problem, attractive for its simplicity and hardness guaranteed by reductions from hard computational lattice problems. Its algebraic variants, ring-learning with errors (RLWE) and polynomial learning with errors (PLWE), gain efficiency over standard LWE, but their security remains to be thoroughly investigated. In this work, we consider the “smearing” condition, a condition for attacks on PLWE and RLWE introduced in Elias et al. We expand upon some questions about smearing posed by Elias et al. and show how smearing is related to the coupon collector’s problem. Furthermore, we develop an algorithm for computing probabilities related to smearing. Finally, we present a smearing-based algorithm for solving the PLWE problem.
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Quantum cryptography (quantum-theoretic aspects), 62a01, coupon collector's problem, Computer Science - Information Theory, Information Theory (cs.IT), smearing, 11y16, 11z05, coupon collector’s problem, ring learning with errors, 81p94, 06b05, lattices, Quantum computation, QA1-939, Cryptography, 11t71, Mathematics, polynomial learning with errors, learning with errors
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Quantum cryptography (quantum-theoretic aspects), 62a01, coupon collector's problem, Computer Science - Information Theory, Information Theory (cs.IT), smearing, 11y16, 11z05, coupon collector’s problem, ring learning with errors, 81p94, 06b05, lattices, Quantum computation, QA1-939, Cryptography, 11t71, Mathematics, polynomial learning with errors, learning with errors
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
