Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Medical Recordsarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Medical Records
Article . 2023 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Comparison of Feature Selection Methods in Breast Cancer Microarray Data

Authors: Melih AGRAZ;

Comparison of Feature Selection Methods in Breast Cancer Microarray Data

Abstract

Aim: We aim to predict metastasis in breast cancer patients with tree-based conventional machine learning algorithms and to observe which feature selection methods is more effective in machine learning methods related to microarray breast cancer data reducing the number of features. Material and Methods: Feature selection methods, least squares absolute shrinkage (LASSO), Boruta and maximum relevance-minimum redundancy (MRMR) and statistical preprocessing steps were first applied before the tree-based learning conventional machine learning methods like Decision-tree, Extremely randomized trees and Gradient Boosting Tree applied on the microarray breast cancer data. Results: Microarray data with 54675 features (202 (101/101 breast cancer patients with/without metastases)) was first reduced to 235 features, then the feature selection algorithms were applied and the most important features were found with tree-based machine learning algorithms. It was observed that the highest recall and F-measure values were obtained from the XGBoost method and the highest precision value was received from the Extra-tree method. The 10 arrays out of 54675 with the highest variable importance were listed. Conclusion: The most accurate results were obtained from the statistical preprocessed data for the XGBoost and Extra-trees machine learning algorithms. Statistical and microarray preprocessing steps would be enough in machine learning analysis of microarray data in breast cancer metastases predictions.

Related Organizations
Keywords

microarray;breast cancer;metastasis;machine learning;feature selection;maximum relevance - minimum redundancy (MRMR), Microarray;breast cancer;metastasis;machine learning;feature selection, ​Internal Diseases, İç Hastalıkları

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Average
Average
Average
gold
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research