
The variety of Russian natural scenery provides its natives with unique perceptive experience. Previous studies of this issue show cross-cultural differences among Russians and other cultures in their descriptions and emotional evaluation of landscapes. Our research aims to broaden the results of previous literature by exploring the connection between subjective judgements of landscapes by Russians and visual-spatial attention. Participants (n = 187; 136 females) were shown 102 pictures of native and foreign natural scenes and were asked to assess them by affective and location qualities using the semantic differential. During the picture presentation, eye movements were recorded with the usage of Tobii and Gazepoint eye-trackers. Our results suggest a link between individuals’ cognitive evaluation of landscapes and visual behavior. Duration of fixation correlated significantly with exotism and familiarity marks (p < .01) for the landscapes, indicating the novel visual information which is gained from an exotic scenery demands additional attention resources. The correlation was also found among average saccade duration, emotional and aesthetic assessments (p < .01). Therefore, the elongation of eye movement shifts might be a signifier of interest in the landscape. In the current study, we demonstrate the connection between visual attention and subjective judgment of a landscape image, which have not been shown previously for the Russian sample.
RUSSIANS, EMOTIONAL PERCEPTION, ПЕЙЗАЖ, АЙТРЕКИНГ, LANDSCAPE, CROSS-CULTURAL STUDIES, КРОСС-КУЛЬТУРНЫЕ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯ, EYE-TRACKING, РОССИЯНЕ, ЭМОЦИОНАЛЬНОЕ ВОСПРИЯТИЕ, VISUAL ATTENTION, ЗРИТЕЛЬНОЕ ВНИМАНИЕ
RUSSIANS, EMOTIONAL PERCEPTION, ПЕЙЗАЖ, АЙТРЕКИНГ, LANDSCAPE, CROSS-CULTURAL STUDIES, КРОСС-КУЛЬТУРНЫЕ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯ, EYE-TRACKING, РОССИЯНЕ, ЭМОЦИОНАЛЬНОЕ ВОСПРИЯТИЕ, VISUAL ATTENTION, ЗРИТЕЛЬНОЕ ВНИМАНИЕ
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
