
FLEXPART, a Lagrangian particle dispersion model, is widely used in atmospheric dispersion and nuclear emergency response studies. However, a systematic sensitivity analysis of this model is still lacking. This study, which utilizes meteorological data output from the WRF model (with 1 km spatial resolution and 1 h temporal resolution) to drive the FLEXPART model, validates FLEXPART using the Kincaid experiment data and assesses its sensitivity to key parameters: particle number, lower bound of the turbulence intensity, and grid size. The simulation results demonstrate that the model adequately reproduces the plume dispersion pattern and covers most monitoring stations. Furthermore, the numerical results show high consistency with the observational data (FAC2: 0.50; FB: −0.22; NMSE: 1.01). The sensitivity results indicate that the particle number and the grid size significantly influence the model performance. It is recommended to use a particle number of 1000 particles/min, a lower bound of the turbulence intensity of (0.6, 0.6, 0.3) m/s, a horizontal grid size of 100 m, and a vertical grid size of 10 m for similar scenarios. These findings offer actionable guidance for parameter selection in nuclear emergency scenarios and similar dispersion studies, supporting improved model reliability and applicability.
Atmospheric dispersion, Lagrangian particle model, TK9001-9401, Nuclear engineering. Atomic power, Sensitivity analysis, Model evaluation, Kincaid
Atmospheric dispersion, Lagrangian particle model, TK9001-9401, Nuclear engineering. Atomic power, Sensitivity analysis, Model evaluation, Kincaid
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
