
AbstractThe predictive performance of polygenic scores (PGS) is largely dependent on the number of samples available to train the PGS. Increasing the sample size for a specific phenotype is expensive and takes time, but this sample size can be effectively increased by using genetically correlated phenotypes. We propose a framework to generate multi-PGS from thousands of publicly available genome-wide association studies (GWAS) with no need to individually select the most relevant ones. In this study, the multi-PGS framework increases prediction accuracy over single PGS for all included psychiatric disorders and other available outcomes, with prediction R2 increases of up to 9-fold for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder compared to a single PGS. We also generate multi-PGS for phenotypes without an existing GWAS and for case-case predictions. We benchmark the multi-PGS framework against other methods and highlight its potential application to new emerging biobanks.
Multifactorial Inheritance, Phenotype, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Science, Q, Humans, [SDV.GEN.GH] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Genetics/Human genetics, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/genetics, Multifactorial Inheritance/genetics, Article, Genome-Wide Association Study
Multifactorial Inheritance, Phenotype, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Science, Q, Humans, [SDV.GEN.GH] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Genetics/Human genetics, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/genetics, Multifactorial Inheritance/genetics, Article, Genome-Wide Association Study
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 44 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
