
In challenging environments such as space, where decisions made by a network of satellites can be prone to inaccuracies or biases, leveraging smarter systems for onboard data processing, decision making is becoming increasingly common. To ensure fault tolerance within the network, consensus mechanisms play a crucial role. However, in a dynamically changing network topology, achieving consensus among all satellites can become excessively time consuming. To address this issue, the practical Byzantine fault-tolerance algorithm is employed, utilizing satellite trajectories as input to determine the time required for achieving consensus across a subnetwork of satellites. To optimize the selection of subsets for consensus, a mixed integer linear programming approach is developed. This method is then applied to analyze the characteristics of optimal subsets using satellites from the International Charter: Space and Major Disasters (ICSMD) over a predefined maximum time horizon. Results indicate that consensus within these satellites can be reached in less than 3.3 h in half of cases studied. Two satellites that are within the maximum communication range at all times are oversubscribed for taking part in the subnetwork. A further analysis has been completed to analyze which are the best set of orbital parameters for taking part in a consensus network as part of the ICSMD.
Aeronautics. Aeronautical engineering, Ocean engineering, fault-tolerant decision making, practical Byzantine fault tolerance (pBFT), mixed integer linear programming (MILP), QC801-809, on-orbit decision making, Geophysics. Cosmic physics, Consensus algorithm, TC1501-1800, 004, satellite communication
Aeronautics. Aeronautical engineering, Ocean engineering, fault-tolerant decision making, practical Byzantine fault tolerance (pBFT), mixed integer linear programming (MILP), QC801-809, on-orbit decision making, Geophysics. Cosmic physics, Consensus algorithm, TC1501-1800, 004, satellite communication
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
