
To evaluate the prognostic significance of surgical margins in patients undergoing transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) for laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC).A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Google Scholar following PRISMA guidelines. Studies comparing oncologic outcomes between positive and negative resection margins were included. Hazard ratios (HRs) for local control (LC), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were extracted and pooled using a random-effects model to account for inter-study variability.A total of 26 studies, including 5,463 patients, met inclusion criteria. The pooled log-HR for DFS was 0.93 (p < 0.05), indicating a significantly higher risk of recurrence in patients with positive margins. However, no significant differences were observed for LC (log-HR = -0.76, p = 0.59) or OS (log-HR = 0.16, p = 0.40).While positive surgical margins significantly impact DFS, their effect on LC and OS remains uncertain. Further prospective studies are necessary to refine treatment guidelines and optimise oncologic outcomes.
Microsurgery, Mouth, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, Humans, Margins of Excision, Laser Therapy, Prognosis, laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma; margins; prognostic model; survival; transoral laser microsurgery, Laryngeal Neoplasms, Head and Neck
Microsurgery, Mouth, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, Humans, Margins of Excision, Laser Therapy, Prognosis, laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma; margins; prognostic model; survival; transoral laser microsurgery, Laryngeal Neoplasms, Head and Neck
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
