
Summary: We suggest a general logical formalism for logic programming based on a four-valued inference. We show that it forms a proper setting for representing logic programs with negation as failure of a most general kind and for describing logics and semantics that characterize their behavior. In this way, we also extend the connection between logic and logic programming beyond positive programs. In addition, the suggested formalism will allow us to see a reasoning about logic programs as a most simple kind of nonmonotonic reasoning in general.
Semantics for logic programs, logic programming, Logic, Nonmonotonic reasoning, Negation as failure, Foundations of logic programming, Logic programming
Semantics for logic programs, logic programming, Logic, Nonmonotonic reasoning, Negation as failure, Foundations of logic programming, Logic programming
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 9 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
