
In this review paper, the authors critically analyse the use of a number of depth of anaesthesia monitors in light of the most recent literature and their own clinical experience. There appears to be increasing evidence that anaesthesia depth monitors reduce the incidence of unexpected intraoperative awareness and also that they improve the quality of anaesthesia. Proper use of these monitors necessitates background knowledge about the physiology of the loss of consciousness, the type of variable recorded and processed by the monitoring devices, the factors that might interfere with recording and the limits of use. The information provided by anaesthesia depth monitors is detailed and relationships with clinical practice are established to provide the reader with key features for optimal use of those monitors and correct interpretation of data. Practitioners and patient's knowledge and expectations regarding this matter, as well as the cost-benefit relationship are also discussed.
Anesthésie & soins intensifs, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Electroencephalography/instrumentation, Monitoring, Intraoperative/economics/instrumentation, Electroencephalography, Anesthesia & intensive care, Anesthesia, General, Awareness, Sciences de la santé humaine, Monitoring, Intraoperative, Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Humans, Human health sciences
Anesthésie & soins intensifs, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Electroencephalography/instrumentation, Monitoring, Intraoperative/economics/instrumentation, Electroencephalography, Anesthesia & intensive care, Anesthesia, General, Awareness, Sciences de la santé humaine, Monitoring, Intraoperative, Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Humans, Human health sciences
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 26 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
