
pmid: 23846473
Normalized cut is a powerful method for image segmentation as well as data clustering. However, it does not perform well in challenging segmentation problems, such as segmenting objects in a complex background. Researchers have attempted to incorporate priors or constraints to handle such cases. Available priors in image segmentation problems may be hard or soft, unary or pairwise, but only hard must-link constraints and two-class settings are well studied. The main difficulties may lie in the following aspects: 1) the nontransitive nature of cannot-link constraints makes it hard to use such constraints in multi-class settings and 2) in multi-class or pairwise settings, the output labels have inconsistent representations with given priors, making soft priors difficult to use. In this paper, we propose novel algorithms, which can handle both hard and soft, both unary and pairwise priors in multi-class settings and provide closed form and efficient solutions. We also apply the proposed algorithms to the problem of object segmentation, producing good results by further introducing a spatial regularity term. Experiments show that the proposed algorithms outperform the state-of-the-art algorithms significantly in clustering accuracy. Other merits of the proposed algorithms are also demonstrated.
Subtraction Technique, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Photography, Reproducibility of Results, Image Enhancement, Sensitivity and Specificity, Algorithms, Pattern Recognition, Automated
Subtraction Technique, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Photography, Reproducibility of Results, Image Enhancement, Sensitivity and Specificity, Algorithms, Pattern Recognition, Automated
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 10 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
