Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Open Repository and ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
BMC Medical Imaging
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY NC ND
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
PubMed Central
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC BY NC ND
Data sources: PubMed Central
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
BMC Medical Imaging
Article . 2025
Data sources: DOAJ
versions View all 5 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Incidence and features of pulmonary track nodules after CT-guided lung biopsy with track sealing using gelatin sponge slurry

Authors: Grandjean, Flavien; Withofs, Nadia; Detrembleur, Nancy; GERARD, Laurent; Lamborelle, Pierre; VALKENBORGH, Christophe; Dardenne, Nadia; +1 Authors

Incidence and features of pulmonary track nodules after CT-guided lung biopsy with track sealing using gelatin sponge slurry

Abstract

Track sealing (TS) with gelatin sponge slurry (GSS) is efficient in reducing pneumothorax after CT-guided lung biopsy. Nodule appearance along the pulmonary track after TS with GSS is a potential issue that has not been previously evaluated.A secondary analysis of two studies evaluating the efficacy of lung TS in 710 patients in reducing post-biopsy pneumothorax was performed. Among these patients, 377 had a follow-up CT within 2 months post-biopsy and were retrospectively included in this study (187 had TS with GSS, 83 with saline, and 107 no TS). Imaging findings of the pulmonary track were described. Binary logistic regression was used to determine factors associated with lung track nodules.Median time between biopsy and follow-up CT was 29 days (range, 1-61). A pulmonary track nodule was detected on follow-up CT in 65/377 (17.2%) patients. Sixty three out of these 65 nodules (97%) were observed in the GSS group. Factors significantly associated with nodules on multivariate analysis were GSS use (odds ratio: 47.4, 95%CI:11.8-189.5; p  6 weeks after the biopsy.A pulmonary nodule along the biopsy track was detected on follow-up CT in 34% of cases when TS with GSS was performed. Recognition of these nodules on chest imaging is essential to avoid misinterpretation.Not applicable.

Keywords

Male, Image-Guided Biopsy, Adult, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Lung Neoplasms, Lung/pathology, Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods, Lung Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging, Sciences de la santé humaine, Lung/diagnostic imaging, Solitary Pulmonary Nodule/epidemiology, Solitary Pulmonary Nodule/pathology, Medical technology, Lung Neoplasms/pathology, Humans, Track sealant, Human health sciences, R855-855.5, Image-Guided Biopsy/adverse effects, Lung, Retrospective Studies, Aged, Gelatin sponge, Aged, 80 and over, Pneumothorax/etiology, Research, Incidence, Radiologie, médecine & imagerie nucléaire, Pneumothorax, Solitary Pulmonary Nodule, Middle Aged, CT-guided lung biopsy, Pneumothorax/prevention & control, Solitary Pulmonary Nodule/diagnostic imaging, Gelatin, Image-Guided Biopsy/methods, Female, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Radiology, nuclear medicine & imaging

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
gold