
pmid: 9363003
Peak-ratio interference pattern analysis (peak-ratio method) is said to have a high sensitivity and to be independent of sex and age. This study was carried out to prove or disprove these findings. The peak-ratio method and qualitative motor unit action potential (MUAP) analysis were applied to the right brachial biceps and anterior tibial muscles of 44 healthy subjects, aged 23-87 years, 25 neuropathy patients, aged 21-83 years, and 29 myopathy patients, aged 19-70 years. Peak-ratio parameters were independent of sex and age. They tended to be lower in the anterior tibial muscle than in the brachial biceps muscle. Neuropathy patients typically showed decreased peak-ratio, short time intervals and increased amplitude/turn. Myopathy patients typically showed increased peak-ratio, turns/s and short time intervals. The sensitivity of the peak-ratio method was 72% for neuropathy patients and 59% for myopathy patients. The sensitivity of the peak-ratio method was similar to that of the MUAP analysis in neuropathy patients and higher than that of the MUAP analysis in myopathy patients. The specificity of the peak-ratio method was 80%. The peak-ratio method proved to be a valuable, supplementary electromyographic tool for the detection of neuromuscular disorders.
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Electromyography, Age Factors, Action Potentials, Neuromuscular Diseases, Middle Aged, Sensitivity and Specificity, Sex Factors, Humans, Female, Prospective Studies, Aged
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Electromyography, Age Factors, Action Potentials, Neuromuscular Diseases, Middle Aged, Sensitivity and Specificity, Sex Factors, Humans, Female, Prospective Studies, Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 27 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
