
AbstractForensic tools assist analysts with recovery of both the data and system events, even from corrupted storage. These tools typically rely on “file carving” techniques to restore files after metadata loss by analyzing the remaining raw file content. A significant amount of sensitive data is stored and processed in relational databases thus creating the need for database forensic tools that will extend file carving solutions to the database realm. Raw database storage is partitioned into individual “pages” that cannot be read or presented to the analyst without the help of the database itself. Furthermore, by directly accessing raw database storage, we can reveal things that are normally hidden from database users.There exists a number of database-specific tools developed for emergency database recovery, though not usually for forensic analysis of a database. In this paper, we present a universal tool that seamlessly supports many different databases, rebuilding table and other data content from any remaining storage fragments on disk or in memory. We define an approach for automatically (with minimal user intervention) reverse engineering storage in new databases, for detecting volatile data changes and discovering user action artifacts. Finally, we empirically verify our tool's ability to recover both deleted and partially corrupted data directly from the internal storage of different databases.
Medical Laboratory Technology, File carving, Database storage modeling, Stochastic analysis, Database forensics, Law, Memory analysis, Computer Science Applications
Medical Laboratory Technology, File carving, Database storage modeling, Stochastic analysis, Database forensics, Law, Memory analysis, Computer Science Applications
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 37 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
