
Abstract. The absence of validation or comparison data for verifying flood mapping methods poses a significant challenge in developing operational hydraulic approaches. This article aims to address this gap by presenting a benchmark dataset for flash flood mapping in the French Mediterranean region. The dataset described in this paper (https://doi.org/10.57745/IXXNAY, Nicolle et al., 2024) includes flood hazard maps and simulation results of three actual flash flood events, all computed in a steady regime at a 5 m resolution using a 2D SWE (shallow water equation) model (neglecting inertia) named Floodos (Davy et al., 2017). Additionally, it includes the input data necessary (digital terrain models, inflow discharges, hydrographic network) for conducting similar simulations with other hydrodynamic modelling approaches in both steady and unsteady regimes. A comprehensive validation dataset, comprising observed flood extents, high water marks, and rating curves, is also provided, enabling a detailed evaluation of 2D hydraulic simulation results. The simulation results from Floodos, compared against stage–discharge rating curves available at gauging stations, yielded highly encouraging outcomes. The median error (sim.–obs.) was −0.04 m for the 2-year return period and −0.14 m across all simulated return periods, ranging from 2 to 1000 years.
Environmental sciences, QE1-996.5, Flash flood, [SDU.STU.HY] Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Earth Sciences/Hydrology, Hydraulics, [PHYS.MECA.MEFL] Physics [physics]/Mechanics [physics]/Fluid mechanics [physics.class-ph], GE1-350, Geology, [INFO.INFO-MO] Computer Science [cs]/Modeling and Simulation, Simulation
Environmental sciences, QE1-996.5, Flash flood, [SDU.STU.HY] Sciences of the Universe [physics]/Earth Sciences/Hydrology, Hydraulics, [PHYS.MECA.MEFL] Physics [physics]/Mechanics [physics]/Fluid mechanics [physics.class-ph], GE1-350, Geology, [INFO.INFO-MO] Computer Science [cs]/Modeling and Simulation, Simulation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
